![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
If not, let's not have LOCOG sue B3ta, I quite like it here.
( ,
Mon 16 Jul 2012, 21:16,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
edit: also, i do really like this
( ,
Mon 16 Jul 2012, 21:20,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but I don't really want to spend the next year of my life begging for money online so I can pay for lawyers to defend us
( ,
Mon 16 Jul 2012, 21:19,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
LOCOG, if you're reading this, we all think you're wonderfully good eggs, and I would further point out that the picture above which may have you concerned clearly only superficially resembles the O******s logo. I would also point to precedent in the case of Samsung vs Apple, in which it was ruled that Samsung haven't violated Apple's patents because their 'tablet' computer is "less cool" than Apple's, and argue that since the aforementioned picture is significantly cooler than your logo, no transgressions have taken place.
( ,
Mon 16 Jul 2012, 21:23,
archived)