![[challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif "Challenge Entry: Film Sequels"){kind=small}
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a first instalment in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a sequel featuring just one of the original cast.
Editor's note: Pride & Prejudice is in fact the fourth in the long-running series, but chronologically set before the events of The Pride and the Prejudice: Pemberley Drift.
From the Film Sequels challenge. See all 127 entries (closed)
(, Mon 1 Oct 2018, 6:31, archived)
Moist Excellente!
The original remains the only film I've ever walked out on.
(,
Mon 1 Oct 2018, 6:39,
archived)
The original remains the only film I've ever walked out on.
I've sort of seen the first three......inasmuch as I was in the room when they were on telly. I don't remember much. They kind of slid off my brain.
(,
Mon 1 Oct 2018, 17:11,
archived)
I'd never looked at the original before, the art direction on it is horrendous.Some fast cars in a colour that will stand out? ✓
Loads of black shadows to cover up all the joins? ✓
Three blokes' faces but almost no other body part? ✓
Barely-clad upper chest of two female characters? ✓
Devon Aoki's head clearly taken from a completely different photo? er...
(,
Mon 1 Oct 2018, 7:53,
archived)
Loads of black shadows to cover up all the joins? ✓
Three blokes' faces but almost no other body part? ✓
Barely-clad upper chest of two female characters? ✓
Devon Aoki's head clearly taken from a completely different photo? er...
Look, this film contains sporty vehicles, actors that you've heard of, and breasts
"Oh Mr Darcy, your ability to jack a Lamborghini in under a minute and outrace the Bow Street Runners is quite the talk of the social circles."
Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇,
Mon 1 Oct 2018, 8:56,
archived)
I dislike both that book and that filmBut this is a wonderful mashup.
(
Cassius Kray floats like a butterfly, stings like a trout,
Mon 1 Oct 2018, 21:19,
archived)