hahaha
You trying keeping a cat still long enough to strap toast to it! Bloody hard that....
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:26,
archived)
Lemme
think..
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead?
Oh no wait a minute.
The other one... wassit called?
*edit* OHHH! waiting for Godot.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:29,
archived)
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead?
Oh no wait a minute.
The other one... wassit called?
*edit* OHHH! waiting for Godot.
Noone is EVER
allowed to refer to Hamlet or Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead in my presence. EVER.
*stabs English classes*
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:31,
archived)
*stabs English classes*
hahaha!
its my favourite play ever and i'm going to constantly quote it just to annoy you :)
(edit) Hamlet that is, not R&GAD, though i plan to read it sometime soon
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:33,
archived)
(edit) Hamlet that is, not R&GAD, though i plan to read it sometime soon
I'm going to see it performed
on Saturday so I guess I can live with it.
Edit: ohh I love Hamlet. Above refers to RAGAD. But I'm all Hamleted out!
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:33,
archived)
Edit: ohh I love Hamlet. Above refers to RAGAD. But I'm all Hamleted out!
Heh
what's a couple of days travelling! Charter a private jet and you'd get there in no time! :P
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:44,
archived)
What a piece of work is man
As for his supposed referencing of Beckett, Stoppard admits that he admires the Irish playwright and had read a great deal of Beckett's non-dramatic literature when he wrote Rosencrantz and Guildenstern but denies any direct links between his play and Godot. Most critics agree that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern resemble Beckett's tramps Didi and Gogo in that both pairs are trapped in a situation that is inescapable; they all confront an existential condition and ultimately lament the meaninglessness of their existence in the face of an "author" who proves no savior and prescribes for them only eventual death. Indeed, Rosencrantz, like Godot, is termed by theatre historians and drama critics an "absurdist" play in reference to Martin Esslin's seminal text, The Theatre of the Absurd. The Theatre of the Absurd, according to Esslin, refers to a body of dramatic work by post WW2 playwrights whose plays are all colored or patterned by an existentialist ideology. Based in large part upon the theories of Albert Camus and John Paul Sartre, existentialism addresses the feelings of "Absurdity" [the absence of purpose or meaning] humanity encounters in a world of shattered beliefs--a world where millions of people are killed in concentration camps and whole cities are annihilated by atomic bombs. "This sense of metaphysical anguish at the absurdity of the human condition is, broadly speaking, the theme of the plays of Beckett, Adamov, Ionesco, Genet, and [others]. [T]he Theatre of the Absurd strives to express its sense of the senselessness of the human condition and the inadequacy of the rational approach by the open abandonment of rational devices and discursive thought." 6 Ros and Guil, many critics argue, encounter such a world where their queries are made in vain, where meaning is arbitrary and where they become victims of a seemingly random circumstance they neither proscribe nor control.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:34,
archived)
Well that was more of a quick Google
But my dissertation was a rip-roaring read:
"like the square root of minus one" Unsolvable Paradoxes in Beckett’s Shorter Prose.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:40,
archived)
"like the square root of minus one" Unsolvable Paradoxes in Beckett’s Shorter Prose.
ah-hahahahaha
'rip-roaring' read is a great way to describe any dissertation!
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:41,
archived)
It's a high-octane rollercoaster ride of excitement
At least that's what the examiner said.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:42,
archived)
I've not been able to put it down yet.
A real page-turner.
I managed to get the words "rectum" "cyst" and "crab-lice" onto the first page. And there is a whole paragraph about cow-pats.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:49,
archived)
I managed to get the words "rectum" "cyst" and "crab-lice" onto the first page. And there is a whole paragraph about cow-pats.
I can't lose
I love this quotation (from First Love)
"For had my love been of this kind would I have stooped to inscribe the letters of Anna in time’s forgotten cowpats?”
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:58,
archived)
"For had my love been of this kind would I have stooped to inscribe the letters of Anna in time’s forgotten cowpats?”
Well
I haven't ever read/seen Hamlet, Rosecratz & Guildentstern Are Dead or Waiting For Godot...
/ashamed of literary ignorance
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:37,
archived)
/ashamed of literary ignorance
think of it as a good
thing.
RAGAD is a bit silly,
Hamlet is depressing
WFG is plain weird.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:43,
archived)
RAGAD is a bit silly,
Hamlet is depressing
WFG is plain weird.
Hamlet is very depressing
And of the bit of R&G* I've read so far has just seemed strange.
* Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead is such a pain in the arse to type/write/say/etc
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:46,
archived)
* Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead is such a pain in the arse to type/write/say/etc
wow
I bet all that text is really interesting.
Sadly I'll just have to guess what it says, as my attention span isn't up to it.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:44,
archived)
Sadly I'll just have to guess what it says, as my attention span isn't up to it.
I didn't read it either
But if someone tells me not to talk about something then it's my duty to annoy them if possible
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:46,
archived)
didn't
Douglas Adams or someone like that suggest this as a method of generating power?
Nicely done tho, reminds me of a After Dark type screensaver I nearly got round to making featuring spinning cat/toast creations bouncing about the screen...
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:32,
archived)
Nicely done tho, reminds me of a After Dark type screensaver I nearly got round to making featuring spinning cat/toast creations bouncing about the screen...
Probably
he did, the geezer. I always loved those hitchhikers guide books
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:34,
archived)
err it's wrong!! (sort of)
You need to strap the toast butter side up to the cat's feet - THEN you wil get hovering cats. I like that idea more.
God elemetary physics gone wrong..
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:37,
archived)
God elemetary physics gone wrong..
No!
Because the butter on the toast also wants to
land down making it spin and hover in the air!
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:39,
archived)
land down making it spin and hover in the air!
yup you are right
so I changed it - floating cats all ovre the place would be waaay better
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:40,
archived)
actually, i think you're probably right there
the other way round it would just land happily either way wouldn't it.
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:40,
archived)
I saw it on
Brainofbrian.com
apparently could be made to make a mag lev train
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 16:19,
archived)
apparently could be made to make a mag lev train
GENIUS!
i can see power stations closing. what a fantastic idea!
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 12:42,
archived)
I really
laughed really really hard at that for a really really long time.
I have never seen such genius (that I can remember)
( ,
Tue 27 May 2003, 16:20,
archived)
I have never seen such genius (that I can remember)