WellWhy did the twat not do it to start with?
could have saved a bit of aggro
but he would have got rid of some of the world fluffyness.
I need to get some sleep...
(could have saved a bit of aggro
but he would have got rid of some of the world fluffyness.
I need to get some sleep...
Giant bunny jumping out like a large happy tourettes rabbit,
Tue 24 Feb 2004, 10:37,
archived)
To give him the benefit of the doubt*he could well have put a copyright notice on the original image when it first slipped onto the web. That doesn't stop somebody else from copying it and posting it somewhere like ratemykitten.
(I think nohands is overrated anyway - clive is far superior)
(* = to drag this argument out until it drops into the archives)
((I think nohands is overrated anyway - clive is far superior)
(* = to drag this argument out until it drops into the archives)
Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie,
Tue 24 Feb 2004, 10:45,
archived)
Except that's not how copyright worksYou don't have to put a copyright notice on something for it to be copyrighted. See www.bitlaw.com/copyright/obtaining.html for more information, particularly the "Automatic Creation" paragraph. Since 1978, a copyright notice has only been a formality, not actually required.
(,
Tue 24 Feb 2004, 19:23,
archived)