If you make that smaller
there's a chance it could get on the front page cos its very woosome indeed.
(
bovine I'm so old, even my old is old,
Thu 28 Nov 2002, 9:45,
archived)
I would second that
280 pixels wide is what you need.
(
Dr Phil Kitten,
Thu 28 Nov 2002, 9:53,
archived)
curses!
arrgh! after much hurried fiddling, i got it smaller, but lost the transparentiness! For future reference, do frontpage pics have to be 280 wide? Or can they be smaller than that?
(
fishsticks,
Thu 28 Nov 2002, 10:04,
archived)
280
Or smaller yes.
(
[Coo] is one of the Originals..,
Thu 28 Nov 2002, 10:07,
archived)
they can be smaller
but they can never be bigger.
/wisdom
(
Dr Phil Kitten,
Thu 28 Nov 2002, 10:08,
archived)