b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 651344 (Thread)

# Threadjack!

Is that the new furtive I see before you?
(, Fri 10 Jan 2003, 23:58, archived)
# Yes it is
Trying to decide if I like it. It's only there for novelty value and will probably go back the Old Skool Furtive soon.
(, Fri 10 Jan 2003, 23:59, archived)
# well
allow me to be a voice in the wilderness and say: I LIKE IT. I will get one soon.
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:00, archived)
# Coo
I think you're the first positive voice there. You can change it under "Update your profile".

Everyone else has passed comments like "I hate it" or "Is that an owl?"
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:01, archived)
# I likey
looks good
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:05, archived)
# I like it
but I must admit I was expecting the new furtive to be a kitten or a human with whiskers and a deerstalker hat on or maybe a penguin.
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:02, archived)
# I think pep was (understandably) struggling with the size...
you can't get much detail into that space. A McCririck would really be pushing it!
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:07, archived)
# there could of been a b3ta comp to design a new one
?
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:10, archived)
# that's why I didn't do a kitten (yet)
too boring.
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:17, archived)
# I like it,
a bit unexpected, but thats what is so unique aboot it.
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:21, archived)
# its
a bit Jamie Hewlett... so I like it lots
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:27, archived)
# thankyou both of you
:)
It's not easy this you know...
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:39, archived)
# bovine - deadline
tomorrow afternoon would be alright so don't stay up late or anything tonight on my account ;)
Not that I've given you the password for it anyway...
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:29, archived)
# woo!
For kitten anticipation.
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:23, archived)
# oh you are superb
but the so-called furtive is not (in my not nearly humble enough opinion)
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:04, archived)
# that's so much better than mine...
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:05, archived)
# Well, duh!
Of course it's better.

Yours is obviously a 2 tonne threadjack, the other one must be at least 3 tonne, possibly 3.5 tonne!
(, Sat 11 Jan 2003, 0:09, archived)