So very wrong..
And since when did the playboy bunny logo become a fashion accessory for the under 18's? In a sane world, NEVER. But in this messed up one I have seen it emblazoned across the belt buckles of what could only be at the oldest a 10 year old girl, and even worse, in the window of an Argos back to school display there were playboy bunny pencil cases other bits of tat that no-one over the age of 18 would ever want or need. WTF is going on here?
(AmiBambini, Tue 21 Oct 2008, 15:35, 3 replies)

^ This
Has Hugh Hefner decided to extend his market to include kiddy-fiddling?
(LongJohnBaldry, Tue 21 Oct 2008, 15:40, closed)

Hey, there's a reccession on, you know!
If Joe Bloggs can't afford to buy that loaf of bread to feed his family, why should Hugh have to wait until they're 18 to start making money from them when he could be going for their (playboy, natch) purse from age 8?

Seriously, though, I think the problem there is the word "Play" being really kid-friendly.

They really should make it mandatory that all these Playboy accessories come with a copy of Playboy.
( uberdeity Wondered why Owen Lars knew of the term "hell" on, Tue 21 Oct 2008, 15:59, closed)

I might be inclined to buy the pencil case then...
.
(LongJohnBaldry, Tue 21 Oct 2008, 16:35, closed)

It's marketed younger than that
I've taught primary school classes, where girls have the bunny logo on pink pencil cases. :(
( masakatsu best of all the burger meats, Tue 21 Oct 2008, 15:56, closed)

Remember Argos
used to see nothing wrong in a junior pole-dancers kit, complete with pole, dress up shoes etc etc..
It was for 10-16s...

And it had nothing to do with Eastern Europe

They only agreed to withdraw it after a huge campaign staged by Kidscape amongst others...

I could weep
(Beer Elf Thought this was like a campfire, anyhow, on, Tue 21 Oct 2008, 20:32, closed)