Home Science
Have you split the atom in your kitchen? Made your own fireworks? Fired a bacon rocket through your window?
We love home science experiments - tell us about your best, preferably with instructions.
Extra points for lost eyebrows / nasal hair / limbs
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 17:25)
Have you split the atom in your kitchen? Made your own fireworks? Fired a bacon rocket through your window?
We love home science experiments - tell us about your best, preferably with instructions.
Extra points for lost eyebrows / nasal hair / limbs
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 17:25)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I was discussing and refining this with a doctor at the weekend.
We concluded that four cats strapped back-to-back would be more efficient, but in order to build a monorail to run on such, you'd have to decide whether or not you wanted to get off the train before you knew where your station was, because of Schrodinger's theories &c.
( , Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:47, 1 reply)
We concluded that four cats strapped back-to-back would be more efficient, but in order to build a monorail to run on such, you'd have to decide whether or not you wanted to get off the train before you knew where your station was, because of Schrodinger's theories &c.
( , Tue 14 Aug 2012, 14:47, 1 reply)
Good point.
and because obviously only a live cat would try to land on its feet, if one of the cats in the array died then the whole thing would spin out of orbit, so you'd need one of Schroedinger's boxes to house the feline generator, to ensure that we had some kind of stability in the system.
As long as nobody looked inside to see how it worked then it would work.
This still doesn't solve the problem you have proposed though.
I just haven't thought this through properly and now my head hurts.
( , Tue 14 Aug 2012, 15:12, closed)
and because obviously only a live cat would try to land on its feet, if one of the cats in the array died then the whole thing would spin out of orbit, so you'd need one of Schroedinger's boxes to house the feline generator, to ensure that we had some kind of stability in the system.
As long as nobody looked inside to see how it worked then it would work.
This still doesn't solve the problem you have proposed though.
I just haven't thought this through properly and now my head hurts.
( , Tue 14 Aug 2012, 15:12, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread