Little Victories
I recently received a £2 voucher from a supermarket after complaining vociferously about the poor quality of their own-brand Rich Tea biscuits, which I spent on more tasty, tasty biscuits. Tell us about your trivial victories that have made life a tiny bit better.
( , Thu 10 Feb 2011, 12:07)
I recently received a £2 voucher from a supermarket after complaining vociferously about the poor quality of their own-brand Rich Tea biscuits, which I spent on more tasty, tasty biscuits. Tell us about your trivial victories that have made life a tiny bit better.
( , Thu 10 Feb 2011, 12:07)
« Go Back
I clicked, even though I can't verify that it's actually a reproduction of the Victory.
( , Thu 10 Feb 2011, 12:37, closed)
( , Thu 10 Feb 2011, 12:37, closed)
Ha ha ha ha ha ha and CLICK....from a pedant.
This would win....but for it being 'Victories' plural, and not 'Victory' singular in the question!
( , Thu 10 Feb 2011, 12:56, closed)
This would win....but for it being 'Victories' plural, and not 'Victory' singular in the question!
( , Thu 10 Feb 2011, 12:56, closed)
Nonsense.
If your reasoning held, any post that restricted itself to one anecdote would be ineligible to win.
*out-pedants*
( , Thu 10 Feb 2011, 13:01, closed)
If your reasoning held, any post that restricted itself to one anecdote would be ineligible to win.
*out-pedants*
( , Thu 10 Feb 2011, 13:01, closed)
Quite right
The reason for 'victories' being plural is that multiple posts are expected.
( , Thu 10 Feb 2011, 14:09, closed)
The reason for 'victories' being plural is that multiple posts are expected.
( , Thu 10 Feb 2011, 14:09, closed)
Then we should have scored a "little victory"...
... and made only one post, with everything else in the replies!
( , Thu 10 Feb 2011, 14:59, closed)
... and made only one post, with everything else in the replies!
( , Thu 10 Feb 2011, 14:59, closed)
« Go Back