Protest!
Sit-ins. Walk-outs. Smashing up the headquarters of a major political party. Chaining yourself to the railings outside your local sweet shop because they changed Marathons to Snickers. How have you stuck it to The Man?
( , Thu 11 Nov 2010, 12:24)
Sit-ins. Walk-outs. Smashing up the headquarters of a major political party. Chaining yourself to the railings outside your local sweet shop because they changed Marathons to Snickers. How have you stuck it to The Man?
( , Thu 11 Nov 2010, 12:24)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Yes, he did.
They are spectacularly litigious, and have been known to hound their critics at their homes.
Large, did any of the Scientologists take a photo of you? It's standard procedure in these cases. A photo of you is probably sitting in a file in the Office of Special Affairs as we speak.
Here's a nice anonymous protest report I remember from my days reading alt.religion.scientology (google groups FTW) that mentions the photo stuff.
It can be rather scary.
( , Tue 16 Nov 2010, 10:55, 1 reply)
They are spectacularly litigious, and have been known to hound their critics at their homes.
Large, did any of the Scientologists take a photo of you? It's standard procedure in these cases. A photo of you is probably sitting in a file in the Office of Special Affairs as we speak.
Here's a nice anonymous protest report I remember from my days reading alt.religion.scientology (google groups FTW) that mentions the photo stuff.
It can be rather scary.
( , Tue 16 Nov 2010, 10:55, 1 reply)
I've heard that before
so my floppy-brimmed hat was pulled low over my face. That's no guarantee of course, but I suspect the absence of 35lbs of "energy box" around my midriff, a clean-shaved and clear-skinned complexion (where it used to be full grey-bearded), and an all over #2 (where it used to be just-longer-than-RAF-approved) will put them off the scent.
Of course, I live in the US, the land of the over-armed. And in a state which has a "must issue" policy. For those of you in Blighty, this means that because I have no felony convictions (or misdemeanours, though I don't think they count), all I have to do is present myself to the local Sheriff's department, and they must issue me a permit to carry a concealed weapon. MUST issue.
And the choice is really rather large. I'm partial to the Sig Sauer P220, and some of the smaller Glocks.
( , Wed 17 Nov 2010, 4:53, closed)
so my floppy-brimmed hat was pulled low over my face. That's no guarantee of course, but I suspect the absence of 35lbs of "energy box" around my midriff, a clean-shaved and clear-skinned complexion (where it used to be full grey-bearded), and an all over #2 (where it used to be just-longer-than-RAF-approved) will put them off the scent.
Of course, I live in the US, the land of the over-armed. And in a state which has a "must issue" policy. For those of you in Blighty, this means that because I have no felony convictions (or misdemeanours, though I don't think they count), all I have to do is present myself to the local Sheriff's department, and they must issue me a permit to carry a concealed weapon. MUST issue.
And the choice is really rather large. I'm partial to the Sig Sauer P220, and some of the smaller Glocks.
( , Wed 17 Nov 2010, 4:53, closed)
Gulp
That's just mind-boggling for us Brits, for whom sparklers now require 17-page risk assessment form and a 2-week pre-approval period.
( , Wed 17 Nov 2010, 13:37, closed)
That's just mind-boggling for us Brits, for whom sparklers now require 17-page risk assessment form and a 2-week pre-approval period.
( , Wed 17 Nov 2010, 13:37, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread