Right, except someone has to actually get them involved,
and they can only enforce a limited amount of financial support from you. If he'd manned the fuck up and done more than the bare minimum, they wouldn't need to be involved.
( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Thu 21 Oct 2010, 15:45, 1 reply)

I've got a co-worker whose husband is an IT contractor
currently claiming that he earns £300 a year - as a contractor his "company" earns the money and as its sole shareholder he then pays himself the dividends. From when they were married she knows he's making at least £45K a year.

Despite having this explained to them the CSA is making *her* pay child support to *him* for the weekends when he has them, over and above their losing documents, issuing demands that are in violation of their own rules etc.
( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Thu 21 Oct 2010, 15:59, closed)

I'm entirely struggling to see how most of this is in any way the CSAs fault.

( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Thu 21 Oct 2010, 16:07, closed)

To be honest I tune most of it out
but I wear my "Really? That's shocking!" face so it's alright.
( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Fri 22 Oct 2010, 11:55, closed)

Right, but what proof does she have that they can actually use to make him pay, other than her saying 'he earns more than that.'
It's his fault, not the CSA's.
( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Thu 21 Oct 2010, 16:20, closed)

Well, if he's paying dividends, they must be declared and are a matter of public record. The CSA could very easily find this out - doing so would cost them a quid at most.

I appreciate that the above is probably somewhat beyond your usual modus operandi, and fair play for attempting to take part - but given your depressing lack of knowledge and empathy, you should probably stick to your comfort-zone of calling people 'wankers'. Leave the thinking to others.
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Fri 22 Oct 2010, 17:44, closed)

PSUEDO INTELLECTUAL SNOBBERY!

( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Sat 23 Oct 2010, 16:53, closed)

Nope, just pointing out that you're a charmless thicky.

Also, 'pseudo-intellectual' is hyphenated.
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Sat 23 Oct 2010, 17:11, closed)

Oh, well that's me told.

( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Sat 23 Oct 2010, 17:54, closed)