I can read. Can you?
In your original post you described the money as being "WASTED" on ex-girlfriends. In your reply you described it as "SPENT". See the difference? See how the original word has a whiff of begrudgement about it? As for claiming that it stopped them from "moaning" for a couple of minutes - if that's how you really feel about buying something for someone you are emotionally involved with I feel sorry for both you and them.
( electric_goat, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 9:59, 1 reply)

"I would never complain about the money I spent on them"
Stop trying to twist what I've said.

The original 'wasted' comment was taken from the perspective of my money being gone, spent on relationships that didn't work out. BUT I ALSO SAID THAT IT WAS WORTH IT, EVEN SO, which proves that I don't view it as wasted, even now. And the line about keeping them quiet for a couple of minutes was about one particular ex - and it was said in jest.

You really are a cocksucker of the highest order.

Fuck you.
(TheAmazingMeatMan ™ can't sing, but he's got soul, Wed 6 Oct 2010, 12:50, closed)

Hey Meaty -

( electric_goat, Wed 6 Oct 2010, 22:13, closed)

Quoting isn't twisting!

( electric_goat, Wed 6 Oct 2010, 22:16, closed)

Taking a sentence out of context of the rest of its paragraph, not to mention the whole entry...
...is twisting things. I said that I COULD view it as wasted, then gave all the reasons that I don't.

And why are you so obsessed over someone else's Q.O.T.W. answer, anyway? Why don't you get a life instead of heaping undue criticism on others?

Where's your answer for that, smart-arse?
(TheAmazingMeatMan ™ can't sing, but he's got soul, Wed 6 Oct 2010, 22:35, closed)

Smart-arse answer coming up:
You've posted (original + replies to me) 1,739 words.

I've posted 177 words.

Who needs to get a life?
( electric_goat, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 9:00, closed)