
I mean, if you resigned from a job because of widespread reports of abuse of the system and law breaking, you'd expect to be re-hired in one of the most prominent positions in the country wouldn't you?
( ,
Fri 8 Jul 2011, 19:50,
archived)

Given their own failure to deal with the issue when it first reared its head
( ,
Fri 8 Jul 2011, 20:28,
archived)

Conservatives: Oh yeah? Well you lot wrecked the economy.
Usual Labour response: *silence*
Correct Labour response: That doesn't invalidate our argument. Learn some logic you stupid toffs.
I read Hansard far too much, but that's pretty much the Conservatives' answer to everything.
( ,
Sun 10 Jul 2011, 20:29,
archived)
Usual Labour response: *silence*
Correct Labour response: That doesn't invalidate our argument. Learn some logic you stupid toffs.
I read Hansard far too much, but that's pretty much the Conservatives' answer to everything.

It rather does invalidate their argument. Since they wrecked the economy, any subsequent protestations about their opponents' financial acumen ring rather hollow. You know, what with their not having the faintest idea how to manage money in the first place.
It'd be rather like Gary Glitter's claiming that child beauty pageants are wrong because they sexualise children.
( ,
Mon 11 Jul 2011, 0:30,
archived)
It'd be rather like Gary Glitter's claiming that child beauty pageants are wrong because they sexualise children.