I bet bloody M's been twatting about on Facebook again and mucked up the router...
( ,
Mon 25 Feb 2013, 21:38,
archived)
Dpends.
If you like Roger Moore, knock yourself out. If you're more of a literary Bond fan, I really, really wouldn't bother.
( ,
Mon 25 Feb 2013, 22:19,
archived)
Actually, if you like plots that make any sense,
I wouldn't bother.
( ,
Mon 25 Feb 2013, 22:21,
archived)
And by 'literary Bond',
I don't include that awful piece of Deaver shite, Carte Wank.
( ,
Mon 25 Feb 2013, 22:22,
archived)
i thought the point of bond was 'splosions, gadgets and tits
fantasy escapism stuff. plot? literature? not seen it yet, though it's popped up on that reddit youtube list
( ,
Mon 25 Feb 2013, 22:40,
archived)
Spose.
The books and the films diverged quite early on with a couple of exceptions. Personally, I prefer the Fleming books and one or two of those that followed, although almost none of the John Gardner books were worth reading twice. Or once in many cases. Sebastian Ffaulkes did a good job and it's a shame he didn't try to get another shot at it. They picked Jeffrey Deaver to write one and it was a dripping pile of wanksocks. About 200 pages too many and it's utter, crushing dullness can be summed up with one short quotation about how th henchman fancied his boss:
"His love for him had to remain as buried and as dangerous as a VS-90 landmine."
( ,
Mon 25 Feb 2013, 22:50,
archived)
"His love for him had to remain as buried and as dangerous as a VS-90 landmine."
*reveals hidden door and ushers in*
i must confess to never having read any or ever being that much of a fan. i just grew up with the fillums being on the telly a lot.
( ,
Mon 25 Feb 2013, 23:24,
archived)
Most beautiful Bond film, ever.
Its nomination for an Oscar in cinematography was well-deserved.
( ,
Mon 25 Feb 2013, 22:23,
archived)
So it's a 'Thin Red Line' then?
I loved it, mates hated it, but I did have that hash-cake beforehand?
( ,
Mon 25 Feb 2013, 22:28,
archived)
Climatictic fight scen- Ooooh, jellyfish.
Could have been 40 minutes shorter and still found the plot rattling round in the empty cage of the rest of the film. The cast were great - no doubt about that and some of the imagery was good, but there was way too much of it for the poor-quality dialogue, plot and action.
/ranty rant rant.
( ,
Mon 25 Feb 2013, 22:29,
archived)
/ranty rant rant.