How else do you think he gets contestants?(
Butters and his titanium codsocket,
Sun 17 Feb 2008, 15:56,
archived)
splendid.
god save the queen making another unremarkable comeback,
Sun 17 Feb 2008, 15:57,
archived)
Hahaha!Bloody wonderful. :D
(
Incredibly Ordinary Dave needs your clothes, your boots and your motorcycle,
Sun 17 Feb 2008, 15:59,
archived)
i have never seen that show.Am i to assume that it lacks quality?
(
Dr Scunner She’s a he, technically, but she’s scalding hot,
Sun 17 Feb 2008, 15:59,
archived)
Basically, pick a box and see if you've won a prize.Stretch the whole thing out to half an hour and you have 'Deal or No Deal'.
Seriously, that's as complicated as it gets.
(Seriously, that's as complicated as it gets.
Afinkawan Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango,
Sun 17 Feb 2008, 16:04,
archived)
This ^I watched it once and couldn't believe my eyes.
(
Flowerpot No longer has the vapours thanks to DTH,
Sun 17 Feb 2008, 16:12,
archived)
any skill involved?puzzles or something?
( Dr Scunner She’s a he, technically, but she’s scalding hot,
Sun 17 Feb 2008, 16:15,
archived)
Sitting next to Noel Edmonds for half an hour without ripping his head offOh yeah, and you have to live in isolation with the entirety of the rest of the series' contestants for about two weeks*
*This is absolutely true... ...really...
(,
Sun 17 Feb 2008, 17:19,
archived)
*This is absolutely true... ...really...
Haha!Much woos are congratulated upon you!
*click*
(*click*
xihpete A neutrino walks straight through a bar, with v>c.,
Sun 17 Feb 2008, 16:02,
archived)
HahahaI suspected this all along.
( Flowerpot No longer has the vapours thanks to DTH,
Sun 17 Feb 2008, 16:13,
archived)
SHINANIGANS!
Yours is animated better.
We are the lemon irked your craw on,
Sun 17 Feb 2008, 16:55,
archived)
That is brilliantMay I make a small suggestion:
I think it could do with losing a couple of frames on the part where he hides in the box. It seems a bit too smooth for such a quick motion.
Your style is instantly recognisable as your own so I wouldn't want to take that away but I just got the impression you are putting more emphasis on smooth animation than on timing.
I hope you don't take offence at this, it's a tiny criticism of a very good thing.
(I think it could do with losing a couple of frames on the part where he hides in the box. It seems a bit too smooth for such a quick motion.
Your style is instantly recognisable as your own so I wouldn't want to take that away but I just got the impression you are putting more emphasis on smooth animation than on timing.
I hope you don't take offence at this, it's a tiny criticism of a very good thing.
durbster durbster.co.uk,
Mon 18 Feb 2008, 9:10,
archived)
No offence taken.When I was making it, that motion was a tricky one. It was a toss-up between timing and coherance.
In my earlier days I would've gone for the quicker motion to save time animating, but right now I'm experimnting so went for the readability.
I think perhaps the frame where you can see (not that most will be able to see it when it's running)the very bottom of the torso before he disappears into the box could do with cutting out.
Cheers for the tip.
(In my earlier days I would've gone for the quicker motion to save time animating, but right now I'm experimnting so went for the readability.
I think perhaps the frame where you can see (not that most will be able to see it when it's running)the very bottom of the torso before he disappears into the box could do with cutting out.
Cheers for the tip.
Butters and his titanium codsocket,
Mon 18 Feb 2008, 11:24,
archived)
You're welcomePersonally, I'd like to see a bit more constructive criticism on here.
( durbster durbster.co.uk,
Mon 18 Feb 2008, 13:06,
archived)
TRUFAXOne box in every 25,000 on Deal or No Deal contains the words:
"Punch Noel Edmonds HARD in the FACE
LOLOL
The Banker"
("Punch Noel Edmonds HARD in the FACE
LOLOL
The Banker"
Scaryduck LIKES EGG,
Mon 18 Feb 2008, 14:53,
archived)