b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Guilty Laughs » Post 799748 | Search
This is a question Guilty Laughs

Are you the kind of person who laughs when they see a cat getting run over? Tell us about the times your sense of humour has gone beyond taste and decency.

Suggested by SnowyTheRabbit

(, Thu 22 Jul 2010, 15:19)
Pages: Latest, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

so...
I don't know whats worse, you thinking that this would be good comedy anecdote, or not having the balls and brains deal with it like and adult. Assuming it it true, which it probably isn't.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2010, 21:21, 1 reply)

being in a wheelchair doesn't give you carte blanch to be an asshole to people. Presuming any able-bodied person would most likely have gotten themselves sparked out in a similar situation, he probably got off quite lightly.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2010, 22:13, closed)

yeah, thats right your supposed to beat people up cos' they diss you, yeah, he should have bled man but being in wheelchair saves him from a beating and getting 'sparked out'.
twat
(, Fri 23 Jul 2010, 11:12, closed)
Dude, the QOTW is entitled
Guilty Laughs. Now run along and research the meaning of those words, there's a good boy. Then consider what it's like for military people back from deployment to be told they're not worth anything.
(, Fri 23 Jul 2010, 11:22, closed)
oh so glib and patronising..
with a helping of a pisspoor analogy.
Equating a bullying sailor and the genuinely brave people in the armed forces really doesn't work.
Really? being told they're not worth anything? can't seem to see that anywhere unless you are implying 'radical muslims' then you are really losing the plot to equate it to this.
I'd ask you to jog off and work on it but you've probably not got the capability for real understanding here.
So if the person in the wheelchair was a soldier disabled in Afghanistan or Iraq and it was interservice rivalry that caused the row would that make a difference for you? probably not as you clearly think that those in wheelchairs are worth less than the rest off us.
(, Fri 23 Jul 2010, 13:06, closed)
Zing!
Damnit, you got me. You'll have to excuse me while I go and rethink my life because of a puerile B3ta flame...
(, Fri 23 Jul 2010, 13:33, closed)

Oh, you ridiculous, tedious failure. At which point did I suggest that it would be proper and correct for anyone to be beaten? I merely noted that in a town which has long-standing tensions between the civilian and military populations, if a civilian were to start endlessly hectoring a military fellow, it would a fairly likely outcome. Particularly in a pub, as it's a fair bet drink was involved.

Seriously, if you're too stupid to read basic sentences, and too thin-skinned to prevent yourself bursting into ineffectual, apopleptic rage at every imagined slight, then you should pack up your unwarranted self importance, stow it next to your overweening ego, and fuck off to somewhere more on your level. Some angsty, juvenile Twilight forum should be right up your alley.

Useless cunt.
(, Sat 24 Jul 2010, 12:54, closed)
you imagine too much
the quality of your intellect, your popularity and the size of your cock.
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 0:10, closed)

This is the best you can do? Keep going, you witless nonentity. Having exhausted your pathetically-limited stock of retorts and fallen back on quips I'd have been ashamed to use inthe playground, you'll be reduced to "my dad's bigger than your dad" before long.
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 12:00, closed)
Agreed.
It really is astonishing how short a time it took you to fall to the discussion of relative penile endowments. What has that or popularity to do with the issue in question?

I further find your breathtaking lack of appreciation of the reality of the armed forces alarming. Of course military people aren't always nice: they are paid to kill people in a wide array of less than pleasant fashions. Do keep up, old boy.
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 12:22, closed)

your breathtaking idiocy of assumption is clear for all to see.
you have no idea of my support of or background in HM forces so your continued line of assumptive reasoning is not only false but pointless.
Condoning someones stupid behaviour just because they wear a uniform behaviour is foolish on your part.
Just what are you so ashamed of, me expressing my opinion or your shabby behaviour at condoning the bullying behaviour of a person you describe as the worst person you ever come across?
Think on.
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 23:02, closed)

Your anger and vitriol toward a total stranger is troubling to say the least, that amount of sustained anger over a trivial remark and response goes beyond the range of a normal response. When someone shows that kind of inappropriate rage, especially on a level which seeks to try to humiliate someone unknown is usually in reality a self reflected rage.
Trying to control through verbal bullying of the sort you are attempting demonstrates a fear of being controlled and humiliated which maybe a result of a childhood trauma or series of humiliating events. You are trying to feel powerful by acting out in this way and somehow be ‘better’ in an as yet undefined scenario. The responses are showing your need for revenge and the escalation of insult, with implicit inviting of a response is so you can feed the anger and blame that response as ‘their fault’ as ‘they provoked it’ (a familiar ploy of domestic and other abusers) while being blind to your own failure of self control.
On a simple level, you are acting out what was done to you a long time ago, you are probably in denial on a lot of levels.
Don’t try to replace your thinking that you are only showing contempt, it’s a another expression of anger or rage and trying to ameliorate it by justification and blame is just exacerbating your problems .
Whether you are aware of it I can’t say for sure but your attempt to intellectualise through verbiage can’t hide the deeper need to hurt as you once were and are still demonstrating the effects of it.
I feel sorry for you as you need to deal with this, any response from you from now on is adding fuel to your fire and feeding back into your own cycle of self abuse. I won’t respond further as I can see now it’s not what you need.
Please get help for your own sake.
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 20:06, closed)
Outstanding Failing all round here.

(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 20:31, closed)

I couldn't give a runny shit about your opinion. Fuck off.
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 21:45, closed)
Thing is, you do.
Very much so.
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 15:50, closed)
cheers badge
You give an impression of omniscience, by noticing every comment and communicating your lofty disdain, I imagine you having locked in syndrome and having nothing else to do but trawl this site as you have nothing in your life apart from your blinking interface and fighting off your relatives who want your plug pulled.
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 21:54, closed)
Calm down bumsex.

(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 15:48, closed)
Hahahahaaa!
Agreed. *clicks*
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 10:17, closed)
He's talking about you as well dipshit
And with good reason
(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 11:41, closed)

This would make more sense had you not responded to a very ordinary post by getting on your high-horse, completely missing the point, and calling me a 'twat'.

So - who has the anger issues here?
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 21:47, closed)

There you did it and proved my point as I thought you would.
denial and projection.
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 21:55, closed)

Didn't fancy answering the question about why you responded in such a vile and childish manner to a fairly standard post, then? Or do your alarming double standards permit you to call me a twat, but prevent me from responding?

Also, see point 1, here
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 22:17, closed)

by any standard vile? your observation and comment is hugely out of proportion as was your reactions and subsequent response.
It begs the comment, who the fuck asked you?
You thinks it’s ok to tell AB to keep his opinion to himself but it's ok for you to metaphorically shit on mine?
I have given you feedback on your state of mind, it may be useful to you to reflect on that.
You originally felt compelled to respond to my comment about someone else’s post and expect no consequence from it? you may want to look up naivety and hubris to gain more understanding of your own perspective.
I see no point in debating this further with you as you have demonstrated a consistent and wilful delusion.
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 22:51, closed)

You'll note, my original response was fairly polite. Your childish, toys-out-of-the-pram sweary little over-reaction gained a response in kind. Would you expect any different?

Did you read that link, by the way? Doing so might help you avoid laughably pathetic cliches in future.

Finally - your opinion was already shit. My shitting on it doesn't actually sully it any further - just raises the level.
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 23:02, closed)

you see, you just can't leave it.
those internal demons they are an itch you just have to scratch with all that hate.
you can't seem to move on from this, that seems too much for you going over every point and trying to deny it by responding thus;

projection - 'who has the anger issues here?'

denial - This would make more sense had you not responded to a very ordinary post by getting on your high-horse, completely missing the point, and calling me a 'twat'.

how is that not the point I made about you? as I surmised you don’t have the capability to fully take this in

do you do a lot of this sort of thing on these sites? Your link suggests a large degree of familiarity and supports my view of you.

Done.

Goodnight
That really is all that I will let you have on this.
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 23:19, closed)

That's twice that you've declared a haughty intention to claim the higher ground by posting no further - and immediately made a liar of yourself by fumbling out yet more half-witted, armchair psychiatrist bullshit. And yet you seem to think it's me that "just can't leave it" - despite my never having given any indication that I intended to do so.

Your examples of projection and denial are both entirely erronious, and largely undercut by your initial foul-mouthed response. Your futile attempts to appear erudite are merely digging ever deeper into the mire of your ignorance.
(, Sun 25 Jul 2010, 23:28, closed)
Honestly chaps
I'm sure that chucking an abrasive wheelie into a skip needn't cause this much fuss. It was still bloody hugelarious.

Also, nimrod old boy, as you may have noticed, this is the internet. Nobody can see how morally awesome you are by not posting, just as they have no interest in how extravagantly well endowed you must be. Cor. Just think of the size of that thing....
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 10:16, closed)
It can't be that large, he's forever getting it 'accidentally' up bottoms.

(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 18:15, closed)

I'll ignore the attempt at patronisation once more and trying speaking like a Toff from the 20's old boy is a tad ridiculous.
I do see that putting a possibly disturbed or drunk disabled man into skip and destroying his only means of transportation is not that much to get het up about (really). It's wasn't the point of the subsequent flaming, I think we are all adult enough to see that this is more of a game and isn’t real life? Extending one’s moral outrage and insulting, putting down a complete stranger(s) to see if they bite (trolling I believe?)is part of the game, yes?
I got the impression that you both are well versed in the ways of the internet and in HP’s case through his style of posting, seeks to dominate by appearing intellectually superior. Nothing wrong with that, but what you give out you get back (yes, I have also given it out and got it back)
The escalation Its a bit like road rage here as every perceived slight and insult you feel has to be retaliated with using a bigger gun e.g. I post ‘twat’ he posts ‘cunt’ and so on, but it’s all safe as no one will dump us in a skip and drown our wheelchair (see what I did there?) we don’t have the same rules that would stop us from acting or behaving this way were we face to face.
Nobody here, I hope, is pretending that QOTW is an extension of Radio 4's moral maze and that everything we post is our absolute moral position that represents our core values and beliefs.
I am sure that you are a lovely reservist and that all the nice girls love a sailor, especially in Portsmouth.

I hope HP won’t post some dreary Pseudo intellectual reasoning that he is king of the internet castle based on some legal binding internet rules or loophole. You say potatoes and I say fuck you ,you pig fucking shit eating incestuous cunt smelly mong... ;) ,’ooh, by using a discriminatory slang term for people with downs syndrome means your a hypocrite and that putting smiley that means you have lost as you are retrenching your position in reality and are metaphorically retreating yadda yadda yadaa’

And Badger, I am almost flattered by your interest, I have already given you a statistical breakdown of anal related accident/shenanigans and the 0.5 % it represents of my posting along with your unhealthy obsession with it. it has again been noted and now demonstrated further your deviant interest. Belay it or I shall taunt you once more, Remember AB, B3ta does not replace real life and relationships. oh and it was big enough to make your mother scream when I stuck it up her arse...(0.6 now)
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 21:23, closed)
Hello again.
Did you sleep well?
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 22:48, closed)
no
constant worry about being flamed and my fragile ego being destroyed has left insomnias mark upon me.
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 23:05, closed)
Ah. It'll be the coming back to check on it every so often that does it.
I suggest you banish all wheelchair-related discourse from your mind this evening.
(, Mon 26 Jul 2010, 23:43, closed)
good god
would the lot of you shut the fuck up, please?

edit: realised you have, as no-one's added to this since Monday... oh, the perils of reading through the back pages of QOTWs...
(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 14:22, closed)
Where did you cut & paste that from?

(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 10:31, closed)
point missed by a country mile...
So who deserves respect - the sailor who risks his life for his country, or a foul-mouthed moron who happens to think being unable to walk is justification for an unprompted torrent of abuse hurled at a total stranger?

My parents are registered disabled and if they abused someone just because of their job, I am fairly sure they'd expect to be abused back. A disability is not a get-out-of-jail-free card and, unless the person is mentally ill, it's not a justification to act like a twat.

It's assholes like that who give other disabled people a bad name. No doubt he was pissing his disability benefits away at the pub, so I've got zero sympathy for him.
(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 17:04, closed)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, ... 1