My sex misconceptions
Freddy Woo writes, "aged eight, a boy from my class told me everything these was to know about sex: male prostitutes are called destitutes and women use tampons to stop men sticking their willies up them. Also, women pee out their bums, something I didn't realise was wrong until I was about 18 and my first girlfriend looked at me aghast."
Share everything - Uncle B3ta wants to know.
zero points for conception/misconception jokes
( , Thu 25 Sep 2008, 15:54)
Freddy Woo writes, "aged eight, a boy from my class told me everything these was to know about sex: male prostitutes are called destitutes and women use tampons to stop men sticking their willies up them. Also, women pee out their bums, something I didn't realise was wrong until I was about 18 and my first girlfriend looked at me aghast."
Share everything - Uncle B3ta wants to know.
zero points for conception/misconception jokes
( , Thu 25 Sep 2008, 15:54)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
what always gets me...
with messages like that is that the poster would feel totally vindicated in labelling KMWIP (and presumably all other men) a "rapist" for doing something that was intended to be a prank, yet if it was a post in which a girl had nail-gunned her cheating boyfriend's scrotum to the table, they'd probably be posting "hell yeah, you go girl!".
I don't believe that KMWIP was intending to do anything potentially lethal and (whilst painful) chilli up the flange is not life-threatening, whatever anyone says - oh, and the eye is far more sensitive to damage than a fleshy tube, so if we can use pepper spray, then it's non-lethal. Sore, yes, but that's the idea - maybe it'd have stopped her swinging from cock to cock like tarzan for a while.
However, at no point did the emotional cripple who posted that unpleasant rant say anything about the cheating girl who lied and hurt a guy who cared for her just to satisfy her lust. In fact, the poster is almost saying that women are going to lie and cheat, so men should just accept it and not feel like they have a right to feel hard done by or wish for some sort of retaliation.
So, my question is this - who does more harm to Womens' Rights? The guy (KMWIP) who admittedly acted in a petty act of revenge after being hurt, or the man-hater who has just effectively labelled all women as selfish nymphomaniacs who have no conscience?
( , Mon 29 Sep 2008, 16:46, Reply)
with messages like that is that the poster would feel totally vindicated in labelling KMWIP (and presumably all other men) a "rapist" for doing something that was intended to be a prank, yet if it was a post in which a girl had nail-gunned her cheating boyfriend's scrotum to the table, they'd probably be posting "hell yeah, you go girl!".
I don't believe that KMWIP was intending to do anything potentially lethal and (whilst painful) chilli up the flange is not life-threatening, whatever anyone says - oh, and the eye is far more sensitive to damage than a fleshy tube, so if we can use pepper spray, then it's non-lethal. Sore, yes, but that's the idea - maybe it'd have stopped her swinging from cock to cock like tarzan for a while.
However, at no point did the emotional cripple who posted that unpleasant rant say anything about the cheating girl who lied and hurt a guy who cared for her just to satisfy her lust. In fact, the poster is almost saying that women are going to lie and cheat, so men should just accept it and not feel like they have a right to feel hard done by or wish for some sort of retaliation.
So, my question is this - who does more harm to Womens' Rights? The guy (KMWIP) who admittedly acted in a petty act of revenge after being hurt, or the man-hater who has just effectively labelled all women as selfish nymphomaniacs who have no conscience?
( , Mon 29 Sep 2008, 16:46, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread